Abarim Publications - Patterns in the Bible. It's also the mountain where Jeremiah was said to have buried the Ark of the Covenant (2 Maccabees 2: 4). Quite a mountain, therefore. Our logo is the first letter of the name Abarim (.
We see things, but we also weep a bit at times. The website of Abarim Publications has been online since 2.
- The 11 Greatest Unanswered Questions of Physics Resolution of these profound questions could unlock the secrets of existence and deliver a new age of science within.
- Buy Einstein: His Life and Universe on Amazon.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders.
Facebook . We initially published mostly about patterns that occur both in the Bible and in the fields of Quantum Mechanics and Chaos Theory, but we quickly realized that any further studies required a set of specialized Bible study tools. Computers certainly help, but one thing computers can not do and that is look for the unexpected, the . Computers can't discover patterns that they're not programmed to look for, but humans can (and that's why computers always fail the Turing test; they can't do poetry). So strap on your best sandals; this is one journey we'll have to hoof! Or as Paul wrote: . Our objective is to make the source texts of the Bible available to a much wider audience. We need many more sets of eyes to figure out what's going on, and we'll explain this in more detail shortly.
A short summary of Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe. This free synopsis covers all the crucial plot points of The Elegant Universe.
Richard Dawkins even uses the catchy phrase . But invariably, these same anti- history- denier scholars peg Moses as some lone blundering desert- dweller, who may have had a few good ideas but was elsewise pretty much obtuse. Moses, after all, operated in the bronze age, and if he had been really clever, he would have ushered in the iron age. Here at Abarim Publications we are engineers (endowed with mere Bachelor's Degrees but with three decades of work under our tool belts), and we side with guys like Christopher Dunn, whose research showed that the ancient Egyptians routinely maintained a higher degree of precision than we do today. That is such a big deal that precision- deniers should perhaps be excluded from publicly discussing cultural evolution .
Tech news and expert opinion from The Telegraph's technology team. Read articles and watch video on the tech giants and innovative startups.
But if that were so, we would see a corresponding progression from simple buildings to complex ones, and we don't. The ancients built buildings that reflect a mind- boggling command of mathematics and understanding of the earth and the cosmos. Today the discussion is largely divorced from the possibilities of extraterrestrial intervention, and focuses on explaining the buildings in terms of natural evolution. That allowed it to crawl onto the academic stage and a rapidly expanding body of established scholars find themselves at risky odds with conventional theories. But irrespective of one's leanings, we can all agree that these buildings weren't put there by dummies. But it's highly unlikely that humanity began its transition to urbanization simultaneously around multiple and adjacent centers that competed with each other from the get go. It's much more likely that urbanization arose from centers that covered extremely large areas and had no perceivable competition, and that its natural evolution was initially not focused on harnessing others, but rather on harnessing nature.
We see the exact same process in the early universe where minute variations in density caused the rise of enormous, primordial black holes in vast expanses of empty space. In our modern universe, matter is much more uniformly dispersed, and therefore there is much more interaction between celestial objects. It's the way this kind of evolution works; in two distinct stages from a homogeneous beginning and a period of inflation to the formation of giants, which subsequently evaporate into competing smaller ones.
The Egyptians called this period Zep Tepi, meaning First- Time. Egyptologists have always dismissed reports of the First- Time as legendary, but now it begins to seem that a First- Time period occurs as a rule in an evolutionary process that is marked by rapid expansion into an unoccupied realm. The teacher- gods weren't gods in the modern sense of the word, they were humans in the first stage of cultural evolution. Its counterpart, which we may dub the Last- Time, is marked by competition, during which the empire of the First- Time slowly evaporates and diversifies.
Cosmologists call this state a Heat Death; the Bible calls it End of Time. Both terms sound awfully dreadful, but it's really not that bad. Most evolutionary processes are sub- processes of larger processes, and when one particular process reaches End of Time, another evolutionary process starts with a corresponding Beginning of Time. It's generally a cyclical affair, and the whole business of evolution is a fractal, but please refer to our introduction to Scripture Theory for a closer look at the internal structure of these First- Time and Last- Time periods. Iron, namely, is good for nothing except making weapons. The element has been known about since long before the iron age formally started, but there was little use for it. The ancients didn't use iron because they didn't need it, and not because they couldn't hack it.
It requires a critical mass of centers of civilization in order for all of them to start . When the focus of humanity shifted towards combat and commerce, the knowledge of the world shifted out of the cross- hairs, and was replaced by a new technological evolution, namely that of the technology for warfare, and that's the one we look back on now: a narrow corridor from us to the caves, with somewhere half way Stonehenge, the Giza plateau and the Nazca Lines that cannot possibly exist. Unchallenged human civilizations built similar for the same reason that honeybees and ants construct highly similar buildings all over the world without a common directorate.
Hancock famously calls us a species with amnesia, but it's worse than that. We are a species with a roving eye or a shifting pole. The need for iron came with the invention of international competition. But before the invention of war, the ancients knew much more than conventional historians give them credit for.
It positively isn't. As many mythologists have noted, the Hebrew Bible reflects a collective effort of pretty much the whole Semitic language area, from Babylon to Egypt and possibly beyond, and describes an endeavor that is wholly separate from religion and politics at large. It tells the history of Yahwism, which roughly describes a dedication to truth in its broadest sense. Believe it or not, it takes no effort at all to deceive or be truthful, but it takes quite a bit of cerebral agility to be able to realize that there is a difference. Babies learn very quickly to cry when they associate that behavior with the reward of getting attention, but it takes up to five years to develop a .
In other words, from about five years of age we understand the difference between deception and truthfulness and employ both with equal appreciation and in order to get what we want. Beyond that initial understanding, it takes profound social sophistication to shift the attention away from the objective (what do I want?) and towards the means to achieve it (shall I deceive or not?).
It requires an enormous leap to develop a preference that is so strong that a person will either lie or tell the truth when the opposite course of action would clearly lead to a more agreeable result. Systematic truthfulness, irrespective of the short- term result, requires a thorough understanding of and deep dedication to long- term social cohesion. Natural Yahwism (not to be confused with any formal religion) describes a social movement devoted entirely to being truthful. It's not organized, it has no leader and it is not confined to any particular culture or people.
It's dedicated to creation and the Creator, and results not in religious mumbo- jumbo but in a set of practical and demonstrable skills (technological, social, psychological, medical, etcetera; Deuteronomy 1. The Bible mostly focuses on both Yahwism's development and its relation to political government. Usually Yahwism was enslaved by military or commercial powers (as science is today), but sometimes it enjoyed periods of .
The story of the tower of Babel in Shinar obviously tells of the transition between the First- Time and the present state of affairs, and Abraham's camel journey doubtlessly reflects the rise of exchange in its broadest sense between the great powerhouses of yesteryears. At this point in the story the name Canaan may not even denote a particular location, but rather the beginning of international trade. The ethnonym Canaanite became synonymous with merchant and the signature symbol of full- fledged international trade in the Levant was the camel: . In our language the word .
In Canaan Abraham met Melchizedek, king of Salem (later Jerusalem), who was a priest of El. Elyon (Genesis 1. Likewise of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jesus said that they were not dead, as God is not a God of the dead but of the living (Matthew 2. He subsequently achieved great political power and was also rewarded with a wife named Asenath, a daughter of Potiphera, who was a priest at On, or Heliopolis. All this obviously demonstrates a politically potent alliance between the established heliolithic priesthood and a newly introduced skill to interpret dreams.
That skill remained very important throughout the Biblical narrative (Numbers 1. Kings 3: 5, Daniel 2: 2. The legal father of Jesus was also named Joseph, who also interpreted a dream, also in Egypt, where he had ended up also as the violent result of an encounter with travelers from the east (Matthew 2: 1. Joseph's priestly wife Asenath gave birth to Manasseh and Ephraim, and the descendants of the latter would occupy territory directly north of Judah. A famine in Canaan drove Israel to Egypt, where Joseph was second only to the king (much later the same honor befell Mordecai, the guardian of Esther, representative of the primary Semitic deities Marduk and Ashtoreth), but over time Israel was enslaved and it took the intersession of Moses to get them out. Moses too was highly educated in the arts of Egypt, but when he killed someone he fled to the land of uncle Midian in Arabia, and there he too met a priest.